The History Of The Family Systems Theory Sociology Essay

The History Of The Family Systems Theory Sociology EssayThe definition of Family has become increasingly moot over the past few decades. Family in the twenty-first century is opposite to everyone all families have dissimilar structures and functions, beliefs and p bental attitudes. The term family refers to a unit of measurement consisting of people who ar related to respective(prenominal)ly some other either biologically by notions of blood relations, or alternatively by legal center such as by marriage (Kirby, et al 2000, p45).The definition of a family has changed a lot over the years in that respect are several(prenominal) reasons for the definition to change. The view of the typical nuclear family is no longer the average within society. Nowadays there are more families of divorce, stepfamilies, and extended families, sufficient and poor families. on that point is not a single definition for what a family is people have their knowledge view of what a family is. There are many factors that make families different, such as ethnicity, religion, and economics. Levine (N.D) suggests that families have three introductory goals for the pip-squeakren survival, economic self-sufficiency and self-actualization (Enrique, et al, 2007)Family structure and family work net affect a youngsters disciplinement in many ways. Family structure is the way in which a family is set up, for manikin, single parent families, extended families and nuclear families. Family functioning refers to how family members are emotionally attached, how well they communicate emotions and information and respond to problems (Freistadt and Stohschein. 2012).Everyone has a different view of what family is and how families should be structured. Some make the assumption that children raise precisely be brought up successfully in a two-parent family structure involving a heterosexual affinity. Others take the perspective that children can function well in any family structur e, provided certain basic conditions are met (Wise, 2003).According to Schaffer family structure plays little importance part in a childs development than family functioning.The family is a well-disposed agreement endorsed by law and custom to take care of its members take (Kepner, 1983). The emotional bondings and relationships amongst the members of the family, and their responsibility to the family unit hold them together by the changes of transitions and the complicated connections.Family Systems TheoryMurray Bowen developed the family establishments guess, he recognised that the family was an emotional unit and any changes to the family functioning would bring all members of the family. The family systems possible action emerged from the general systems theory by scholars who found that it had a lot of relevance to families and other tender systems. http//web.pdx.edu/cbcm/CFS410U/FamilySystemsTheory.pdfThe family systems theory refers to a family as a system in which separately member can never be considered in isolation without savoir-faire to the roles, responsibilities and behaviours of other members of the family. The family is seen a dynamic unit according to the family systems theory. Changes are forever occurring and each member of the family takes on new roles and responsibilities, and internal patterns are adopted. The relationships between the individuals in the family unit are mutual and constantly changing.The family is an example of an on release, self-regulating, favor competent system that has certain features such as its unique structuring of gender and propagation set it apart from other amicable systems. Each family system has their own structure, the psychobiological characteristics of its individual members, and its sociocultural and historic position in its larger surround (Broderick, 1993, p37).The family as a system links all individuals together and understands that things going on in the environment can influen ce all individuals nonetheless if not all of them are actively engaged, for example parents workplace. The family system theory recognises that small things can impact the family system, for example, the loss of a parent can affect the relationship the child has with the other parent and/or siblings.http//www.edpsycinteractive.org/ document/family.pdfAccording to Bowen each member of the family system has a roles and boundaries. Individuals in the system are expected to engage with each other in a certain ways according to their role and their relationship with other members.There are four main principles of the family systems theory wholeness, integrity of subsystems, circularity of influence and stability and change. Wholeness refers the family as one unit stock-still each member of the family have certain attributes of their own. Integrity of subsystems means that each relationship is a subsystem, for example fuss and father relationship or baffle and child relationship or vi ce versa. Relationships between relationships are also subsystems. Circularity of influences means that the subsystems and relationships depend on each other and if there is a change in one subsystem it has an impact on other systems. Stability and change refers to external influences that can affect the individual or subsystems, for example parents workplace. The wellbeing of the child, therefore, can be conceived of as dependent upon the functioning of elements of the entire family system (McKeown and Sweeny 2001 6)Family systems are different in all families. agnate attitudes are important in background knowledge up an environment in which their child can flourish. Campion (1985) says that if a child grows up in a stable and loving environment, the child will usually develop a sense of self-respect and self-discipline. The child understands what is expected of him andHowever it can be argued that a child who has been brought up in a family system where the parents attitudes la ck maturity, the child is more likely not to flourish in the environment and not understand what is expected of them, therefore cannot develop a sense of their own competence.Campion (1985) suggests that children take on the roles, which have a function in their family system. It is believed that if children see themselves as the disobedient one in the family setting, they may carry out their difficult behaviours in school. Likewise a child who is obedient may also carry out this carriage at school.The ecological systems theoryBronfenbrenners ecological systems theory states that the environment is reflected in an individuals development. Bronfenbrenners ecological approach refers to layers of environmental influences that impact an individuals development. The interactions with people and the environment are key to development. This theory can apply to individuals at any play of development.The theory identifies five environmental systems in which the individual interacts with mi crosystem, meosystem, exosystem, macrosystem and chronosystem.The microsystem refers to each setting, which the individual is an active participant, such as family, school, community of interests, friends. This layer has the most immediate and earlier influences on the child. The relationships in the microsystem can be bi-directional this means that the childs behaviours can be influenced by the family and vice versa. The meosystem refers to the relationships between the settings in the microsystem and the individual an example of this would be the relationship between home and school. The exosystem refers to a setting or setting where an event happens, which affects or is affected by what happens in the setting that the exploitation person is in. The child is not an active participant in this system. The structures in the exosystem can affect a childs development by interacting with the structures in the microsystem, for example mothers work place can affect the amount of time the mother spends with the child. Although the child is not directly involved with the structures in the exosystem, they do find oneself the positive and negative impacts that are involved with the interaction between the systems. The Macrosystem refers to the wider social systems, for example government legislations and economic factors. These things affect the child indirectly however it has an impact on the developing childs life. An example of this could be that the childs family is living in poverty therefore this can cause social exclusion and the child might not have access to school trips or community play areas. The chronosystem refers to how things change over time as it relates to the childs environment. There are various elements within this system that can be internal or external. An internal influence could be the physiological changes that occur while the child gets older. An external influence could the timing of their parents getting a divorce. The older the individua l gets might impact how they react to environmental changes and may be able understand how the change will influence them.External influences